Author Archive

Tax Newsletter – November 2016

Budget superannuation changes on the way

The Federal Government has been consulting on draft legislation to give effect to most of its 2016–2017 budget superannuation proposals. Here are some of the key changes.

Deducting personal contributions

All individuals up to age 75 will be able to deduct personal superannuation contributions, regardless of their employment circumstances. Of course, such deductible contributions would still effectively be limited by the concessional contributions cap of $25,000, proposed from 1 July 2017.

Pension $1.6 million transfer balance cap

The total amount of accumulated superannuation an individual can transfer into retirement phase (where earnings on assets are tax-exempt) will be capped at $1.6 million from 1 July 2017. Those with pension balances over $1.6 million at 1 July 2017 will be required to “roll back” the excess amount to accumulation phase by 1 July 2017 (where it will be subject to 15% tax on future earnings).

Concessional contributions cap

This cap is to be reduced to $25,000 for all individuals (regardless of age) from 1 July 2017. The concessional cap will be indexed in increments of $2,500 (down from $5,000 increments). Contributions to constitutionally protected funds and untaxed or unfunded defined benefit superannuation funds will be counted towards an individual’s concessional contributions cap. However, any excess concessional contributions in respect of such funds will not be subject to tax, but instead limit the individual’s ability to make further concessional contributions.

 

Note that the Government has decided to:

  • dump the proposed $500,000 lifetime cap on non-concessional contributions (which would have been backdated to 1 July 2007) – instead, the lifetime cap will be replaced by a reduced non-concessional cap of $100,000 per year for individuals with superannuation balances below $1.6 million;
  • not proceed with the proposal to remove the work test for making contributions between ages 65 and 74; and
  • defer to 1 July 2018 the start date for catch-up concessional contributions for superannuation balances of less than $500,000.

TIP: The government says it intends to introduce the proposed changes in Parliament “before the end of the year”. It remains to be seen if the changes will pass smoothly through Parliament. In any case, it would be prudent to check in with your professional adviser to see if and how the proposed changes would affect your retirement savings strategy.

Primary producer income tax averaging

Legislation has been introduced in Parliament that proposes to allow primary producers to access income tax averaging 10 income years after choosing to opt out, instead of the opt-out choice being permanent. The Federal Government says this will assist primary producers, as averaging only recommences when it is to their benefit (ie they receive a tax offset) and they can still opt out if averaging no longer suits their circumstances. The changes are proposed to apply for the 2016–2017 income year and later income years.

TIP: Primary producers have to meet basic conditions to be eligible for income averaging. Please contact our office for further information.

Research and development tax incentive rates change

The Federal Government has reduced the rates of the tax offset available under the research and development (R&D) tax incentive for the first $100 million of eligible expenditure by 1.5 percentage points. The higher (refundable) rate of the tax offset has been reduced from 45% to 43.5% and the lower (non-refundable) rate of the offset has been reduced from 40% to 38.5%. Here are some relevant points to note:

  • Eligible entities with annual turnover of less than $20 million, and which are not controlled by an exempt entity or entities, may obtain a refundable tax offset equal to 43.5% of their first $100 million of eligible R&D expenditure in an income year, and a further refundable tax offset equal to the amount by which their R&D expenditure exceeds $100 million multiplied by the company tax rate.
  • All other eligible entities may obtain a non-refundable tax offset equal to 38.5% of their eligible R&D expenditure and a further non-refundable tax offset equal to the amount by which their R&D expenditure exceeds $100 million multiplied by the company tax rate.

The changes apply from 1 July 2016.

TIP: AusIndustry and the ATO manage the R&D tax incentive jointly. The R&D tax incentive aims to offset some of the costs of undertaking eligible R&D activities. A company must lodge an application to register within 10 months after the end of its income year. Please contact our office for further information.

SMSF related-party borrowing arrangements

The ATO has issued a taxation determination (TD 2016/16) concerning whether the ordinary or statutory income of a self managed super fund (SMSF) would be non-arm’s length income (NALI) under the tax law, and therefore attract 47% tax, when the parties to a scheme have entered into a limited recourse borrowing arrangement (LRBA) on terms which are not at arm’s length.

 

The ATO has also updated a practical compliance guideline (PCG 2016/5) which sets out the Commissioner’s “safe harbour” terms for LRBAs. If an LRBA is structured in accordance with the guideline, the ATO will accept that the LRBA is consistent with an arm’s length dealing and the NALI provisions (47% tax) will not apply. Trustees who do not meet the safe harbour terms will need to otherwise demonstrate that their LRBA was entered into and maintained consistent with arm’s length terms.

TIP: The ATO has allowed a grace period to 31 January 2017 for SMSFs to restructure LRBAs on terms consistent with the compliance guideline’s safe habour terms (or bring LRBAs to an end before that date). Please contact our office for further information.

Travel expense and transport of bulky tools claim denied

An individual has been unsuccessful before the Administrative Appeals Tribunal in a matter concerning certain deduction claims for work-related travel expenses. The individual was a sheet metal worker whose home was located some 60 km from his employer’s main work site. The individual made a number of work-related deduction claims. However, after various concessions made by both the individual and the Commissioner of Taxation, the remaining issue between the parties was whether the taxpayer was entitled to a deduction for work-related travel expenses.

The man argued that his employer required him to supply his own tools and that they were too bulky to be transported to work other than by car. He also questioned whether his employer provided secure storage facilities for his tools. In refusing the taxpayer’s claim, the Tribunal noted it was the taxpayer’s own admission that it was his own personal choice to transport his various hand tools out of security concerns. The Tribunal also said the taxpayer’s security concerns were “not supported by objective evidence”. The taxpayer’s claim was therefore refused.

TIP: The ATO reminds individuals to make sure they get their deductions right. In certain circumstances it will contact employers to verify employees’ claims. In this case, the ATO contacted the taxpayer’s employer to check his claims, including whether the employer supplied safe storage facilities.

 

Finance Newsletter – October 2016

Interest rates drop!

Do you  have the best rate available for your home and investment loans?

You may have noticed a Difference between home loan and investment loan rates? You might be able to save thousands per year in interest by reassessing your current loans. It costs nothing to find out.

If your interest rate is over 3.73% variable then you may be able to save by changing loans and or banks. I have access to a major bank that  is currently offering customers a 3.73% variable rate .This NOT a honeymoon rate, discount is for the life of the loan. Conditions  apply – owner occupied homes, principal and interest payments, minimum loan $150 000,  80% LVR maximum –. No application fee, monthly or annual fees. If you are interested in saving thousands per year call Mercia finance to see if we can show you how to benefit from a better rate.

Investors will have read that most banks are increasing the rate on investment loans. This includes current investment loans. If you are  a property investor check your rates and find out if these increases apply to you. If you are not sure Ask Mercia finance for an obligation free loan check. Some institutions are not increasing the rates for investors. So this is a good time to make sure you have the best loan for your circumstances.

If you have questions regarding any  type of loan, call Dan Goodridge on 04144 233 40. Our service is free of charge to you the borrower and we have access to all the major lenders in WA. Call us anytime. After hours is OK.

Property Newsletter – October 2016

Bigger (infrastructure) not necessarily better for investors

Smaller community infrastructure projects can deliver better price growth to local property markets, because they’re more likely to deliver tangible benefits, such as improved amenity and upgraded streetscapes.

It’s simplistic to assume that big-ticket infrastructure developments will lead to higher house values, as smaller community projects can prove to be more beneficial for property investors.

When deciding on an investment location, it makes sense to consider areas that will benefit from new infrastructure projects, whether it be new roads, public transport, health or activity centres.

Such developments can lead to enhanced amenity and higher demand, which can boost local house prices.

However bigger isn’t necessarily better when it comes to infrastructure and property price growth, as outlined in a new report from Momentum Wealth’s research division.

Take the $1 billion Perth Stadium for example. The research report explains that the construction of large-scale football stadiums typically delivers negligible price growth for nearby residential properties.

Alternatively, smaller community infrastructure projects, such as the $24 million HBF Arena Upgrade in Joondalup, can deliver better price growth to local property markets because they’re more likely to deliver tangible benefits to the area, such as additional amenity (i.e. fitness or family centres) and upgraded streetscapes.

The research report also explains that investors also need to consider the less-obvious locations that are likely to benefit from new infrastructure, as these may make better investment locations.

The $49 million Ellenbrook Rapid Bus Transit System, for example, will benefit residents on Perth’s north-east urban fringe, specifically Ellenbrook and Aveley, through improved accessibility. However the Momentum Wealth research report reveals that the infrastructure will also help to support Morley, in Perth’s inner-metropolitan ring.

Morley represents a much smarter investment location because it’s significantly closer to the Perth CBD, the supply-side fundamentals are more favourable and it has been identified by the state government has a key suburban activity centre.

The Momentum Wealth research report, Perth Public Infrastructure Update Impacts on local property markets, has identified the city’s top government-funded infrastructure projects and provides unique insights and analysis as to how these developments may impact local property markets.

Perth is currently undergoing a once-in-a-generational transformation as the WA state government executes a massive infrastructure investment program that aims to enhance Perth’s useability and liveability as the city’s population grows to 3.5 million residents.

While new public infrastructure projects can be a good indicator for future residential property price growth, investors need to be aware of the different dynamics that are associated from project to project.

It’s also important that investors take a broader view when making investment decisions, and consider other factors other than new infrastructure projects.

Other property price drivers, such as housing demand and supply, demographic shifts and changing structure plans, for example, also need to be taken into account.

All but two Perth councils fail planning test

Just two of 29 Perth metropolitan councils have been given the tick for planning performance in a highly critical Property Council of Australia report to be released today.

Billed as the first independent assessment of its kind, the report found most councils were struggling to implement planning reforms, had outdated local planning schemes and did not monitor or review their performance.

The Department of Planning and WA Planning Commission were also criticised for taking too long to review new local planning schemes or amendments to existing schemes.

The Property Council has long been critical of the local government sector’s planning record, arguing inconsistencies hamper development and the State’s ability to meet its infill targets.

The cities of Melville and Belmont were the only councils deemed to have “a high level of planning performance” across strategic planning, statutory planning, delegation of approval to planning officers and timeliness of approvals.

Councils were assessed and given a score out of 23 based on whether they had a current local planning strategy, an up-to-date local planning scheme, appropriately delegated development applications to experts and processed planning applications within the required 60 days.

The report said performance monitoring in the planning system was “almost non-existent”.

The Town of Cambridge was the lowest ranked council because it had only just started work on a local planning strategy, had lower-than-average levels of delegation and no data on processing times.

Property Council WA executive director Lino Iacomella said the results were “concerning”.

Pockets of Perth property levelling out despite weak real estate market

POCKETS of Perth are showing signs of levelling out, despite the city’s overall market weakness.

Latest figures from CoreLogic RP Data rate Bateman, Hocking and Pearsall as the suburbs with the lowest average difference between the asking and selling price, amounting to a vendor discount of between 4 per cent and 4.2 per cent.

This is compared to higher-end suburbs, where the average vendor discount for Dalkeith, Cottesloe and Ascot is the highest at 12.9 per cent, 11.1 per cent and 10.7 per cent respectively.

Momentum Wealth managing director Damian Collins said in a balanced market the average vendor discount was 3-4 per cent, meaning Bateman was holding steady in the face of Perth’s property slump.

The average number of days a Bateman property stays on the market is 49, which is better than the Perth average of 88, and half Dalkeith’s 98 days.

Mr Collins said high-end properties typically attracted fewer buyers and in softer markets, these vendors had “to discount more to get the sale”.

“The most important thing is comparable sales, not necessarily comparable listing prices,” Mr Collins said.

Realmark Western Suburbs director Adam Gilbert said buyers still had the upper hand and those selling premium properties needed to consider true market value, not what they paid for a home.

“Sellers need to get a realistic assessment of price, meet it, go to auction or ask for offers,” he said.

First National Heron Johns licensee Jenny Gauci, who sells homes in Bateman, said properties priced realistically were selling well.

Bateman had experienced price falls, but they were not as extreme as in other suburbs because of what it had to offer.

“There is demand in Bateman for the school zone and it has good infrastructure, with two train stations and Fiona Stanley Hospital, and it is close to the freeway,” Ms Gauci said.

“The median price is affordable and it is at those homes where there is a lot more competition where we’re achieving better results.”

Tarryn and Jarrad Carlsen started their property search in Booragoon, but bought in Bateman because of the prices and proximity to schools and the freeway.

“We were looking for something we could move into without too much effort, but that had potential for renovations,” Mrs Carlsen said.

After researching prices and allowing for renovations, the Carlsens set a maximum of $750,000, a figure they felt was realistic in the current market.

“We looked at other homes that were perfectly maintained and renovated, but were quite a bit more expensive,” Mrs Carlsen said.

Town of Cambridge Town Scheme Amendment 31 rejected by Planning Minister Donna Faragher

JOHN Day has supported Planning Minister Donna Faragher’s decision to reject Town of Cambridge Town Scheme Amendment 31.

Mr Day was the previous planning minister who made changes to the Amendment in April before the portfolio was passed to Ms Faragher , who said she had the benefit of further discussions with the Town.

Mr Day’s version of the controversial proposal included split coding to enable multi-dwellings up to R30 within 400m of local centres, allowance of two dwellings on corner blocks 900sq m or above in City Beach and Floreat, and Cambridge Street lots to be split-coded R40/R60 to allow for multiple dwellings.

The changes were to be advertised to the public this week.

“(Ms Faragher) has had the responsibility for dealing with Amendment 31 over the last six months and the benefit of further discussions, including with the Town of Cambridge,’ Mr Day said.

“I have full confidence in the decision she has made with all of the advice available to her.”

Ms Faragher announced her decision yesterday after meeting with Town representatives on August 11 and receiving further advice from the Planning Department.

“I have decided against progressing with Amendment 31 in its current form as the eventual outcome is unlikely to be one that would be supported,” she said.

Mayor Keri Shannon said Ms Faragher’s decision would have been “a relief for many” and met with the popping of champagne corks.

However, not everyone supported Ms Faragher’s decision.

Shelter WA spokesman Stephen Hall issued a statement saying the decision was “diametrically opposed to the planning principles already adopted by the WA Government in Directions 2031 and the State Planning Strategy”.

“The State Government has set diversity and infill targets for each local government, which this scheme amendment by the Town of Cambridge seeks to address,” he said.

“The proposed scheme amendment promotes infill and diversity at an appropriate level in Cambridge.

“The failure to approve this scheme amendment perpetuates the NIMBY (Not in my backyard) mentality that has plagued WA planning system for many years.”

Mr Day and Ms Faragher encouraged the Town to progress with planning changes that would allow for more housing diversity.

It is understood the Town has already engaged consultants to commence a strategy that would address the aims of the amendment in a different way.

Tax Newsletter – October 2016

Personal middle income tax rate cut on the way

The Federal Government has introduced a Bill which proposes to implement its 2016 Budget proposal to increase the third personal income tax threshold that applies to personal income taxpayers. The rate of tax payable on individuals’ taxable incomes from $80,001 to $87,000 would fall from 37% to 32.5%.

The non-resident tax schedule would also be amended as a result of the Bill, increasing the upper limit of the first income tax bracket to $87,000. A tax rate of 37% would apply to taxable income between $87,001 and $180,000, and the top marginal tax rate of 45% would remain for taxable income over $180,000.

Shortly following the Bill’s introduction in Parliament, the ATO issued new PAYG withholding tax schedules that reflect the lowered personal tax rate in the Bill. Effective from 1 October 2016, employers will be required to lower the amount of tax withheld for affected taxpayers to factor in the new lower tax rate. Any tax overpaid beforehand will be refunded by the ATO on assessment after the end of the 2016–2017 financial year.

Small business tax breaks in the pipeline

A Bill has been introduced in Parliament which proposes to:

  • increase the small business entity turnover to $10 million from 1 July 2016;
  • increase the unincorporated small business tax discount from 5% to 16% over a 10-year period;
  • increase the turnover threshold to qualify for the lower company tax rate; and
  • lower the company tax rate on a schedule over 11 income years, reaching a unified company tax rate of 25% in the 2026–2027 income year.

Small business entities with aggregated turnover of less than $10 million would be able to access a number of small business tax concessions, including, among others, immediate deductibility of small business start-up expenses, simpler depreciation rules and simplified trading stock rules.

TIP: The $2 million threshold for the purposes of the small business capital gains tax concessions will be retained.

The tax discount for unincorporated small businesses – introduced in the 2015–2016 income year – entitles individuals who are small business entities, or who are liable to pay income tax on a share of the income of a small business entity, to a tax offset equal to 5% of their basic income tax liability that relates to their total net small business income. This offset is capped at $1,000. Although the proposed increases in the offset would increase the amount of offset an eligible individual may claim, the offset would remain capped at $1,000.

TIP: With a difficult Senate, the Coalition Government may make further changes in order to pass its Bill.

Please contact our office for further information.

Single touch payroll reporting legislative changes

A Bill to establish a new reporting framework, Single Touch Payroll (STP), has been introduced in Parliament. Under the proposed changes in the Bill, “substantial employers” would be required to automatically provide payroll and superannuation information to the Commissioner of Taxation at the time the information is created. A number of related amendments aim to streamline employers’ payroll and superannuation choice processes by allowing the ATO to pre-fill and validate employee information.

Entities with 20 or more employees (substantial employers) would be required to report the following information to the Commissioner of Taxation:

  • withholding amounts and associated withholding payments on or before the day by which the amounts were required to be withheld;
  • salary or wages and ordinary time earnings information on or before the day on which the amount was paid; and
  • superannuation contribution information on or before the day on which the contribution was paid.

The changes are proposed to apply from the first quarter beginning on or after the day the Bill receives Royal Assent.

In general, STP reporting will commence on 1 July 2018 for substantial employers and the related amendments will apply more broadly from 1 January 2017. In some cases, the Commissioner may defer these start dates by legislative instrument.

TIP: The ATO has issued a consultation paper, published on its website, which seeks comments on the ATO’s proposed administration of STP reporting.

Take care with work-related deduction claims, says ATO

The ATO has reminded individuals to make sure they get their deductions right this tax time. Assistant Commissioner Graham Whyte said the ATO has seen “claims for car expenses where logbooks have been made up and claims for self-education expenses where invoices were supplied for conferences that the taxpayer never attended”.

Mr Whyte said that in 2014–2015 the ATO conducted around 450,000 reviews and audits of individual taxpayers, leading to revenue adjustments of over $1.1 billion in income tax. Mr Whyte said “every tax return is scrutinised”, and if a red flag is raised and the claims seem unusual, the ATO will check them with the taxpayer’s employer. In addition, Mr Whyte reminded taxpayers that this year the ATO has introduced “real-time checks of deductions for tax returns completed online”.

Please contact our office for further information.


ATO eye on SMSFs and income arrangements

The ATO is reviewing arrangements where individuals (at or approaching retirement age) purport to divert personal services income (PSI) to a self managed superannuation fund (SMSF) to minimise or avoid their income tax obligations.

The ATO notes the arrangement it has described in Taxpayer Alert TA 2016/6 and is encouraging taxpayers who have entered into such and arrangement to contact the ATO so it can help resolve any issues in a timely manner.

Where individuals and trustees come forward to work with the ATO to resolve issues, it anticipates that in most cases the PSI distributed to the SMSF by the non-individual entity would be taxed to the individual at their marginal tax rate. Issues affecting SMSFs will be addressed on a case-by-case basis, but the ATO will take individuals’ cooperation with it into account when determining the final outcome.

TIP: The ATO has said that individuals and trustees who are not currently subject to ATO compliance action and who come forward before 31 January 2017 will have administrative penalties remitted in full. However, shortfall interest charges will still apply. Please contact our office for further information.

Social welfare recipients data-matching program

The Department of Human Services (DHS) has released details of a data-matching program which will enable it to match income data it collects from social welfare recipients with tax return-related data reported to the ATO. The data matching will assist DHS to identify social welfare recipients who may not have correctly disclosed their income and assets. In addition, data DHS receives from the ATO will be electronically matched with certain departmental records to identify people’s noncompliance with income or other reporting obligations.

DHS expects to match each of the approximately seven million unique records held in its Centrelink database. Based on noncompliance criteria, the DHS anticipates it will examine approximately 20,000 records in the first phase of the project. The category of people who may be affected by the data matching includes welfare recipients who have lodged a tax return with the ATO during the period 2011 to 2014.

Finance Newsletter – September 2016

Interest rates drop!

Do you have the best rate available for your home and investment loans?

You may have noticed a Difference between home loan and investment loan rates? You might be able to save thousands per year in interest by reassessing your current loans. It costs nothing to find out.

If your interest rate is over 3.74% variable then you may be able to save by changing loans and or banks. I have access to a major bank that is currently offering customers a 3.74% variable rate .This NOT a honeymoon rate, discount is for the life of the loan. Conditions apply – owner occupied homes, principal and interest payments, minimum loan $150 000, 80% LVR maximum –. No application fee, monthly or annual fees. If you are interested in saving thousands per year call Mercia finance to see if we can show you how to benefit from a better rate.

Investors will have read that most banks are increasing the rate on investment loans. This includes current investment loans. If you are a property investor check your rates and find out if these increases apply to you. If you are not sure Ask Mercia finance for an obligation free loan check. Some institutions are not increasing the rates for investors. So this is a good time to make sure you have the best loan for your circumstances.

If you have questions regarding any type of loan, call Dan Goodridge on 04144 233 40. Our service is free of charge to you the borrower and we have access to all the major lenders in WA. Call us anytime. After hours is OK.